JazzJackrabbit Community Forums

JazzJackrabbit Community Forums (http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/index.php)
-   General Jazz Jackrabbit Talk (http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Favorite JJ2 Resolution (http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/showthread.php?t=14902)

R3ptile Apr 17, 2006 10:46 AM

Marijn, single player is not the problem. If you don't want to see hidden secret rooms, just use 640x480 and nothing would bother you.

Jerrythabest Apr 17, 2006 10:50 AM

jjnoclip jjnowall

Birdie Apr 17, 2006 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marijn
So ya.. It will be MUCH better ;)

No it wouldn't! you've provided reasons that it would be worse.

Jerrythabest Apr 17, 2006 10:58 AM

duh:P he just said what I said to shut me up XD

LittleFreak Apr 17, 2006 12:25 PM

O.o

JJ2 Single Player is so easy because you can see too much already. Multiplayer is a different matter, but I don't think it would enhance the playing experience to be able to see even further away.

Odin Apr 17, 2006 01:02 PM

I think that enhanced resolutions should only be given out to certain people, like me.

R3ptile Apr 17, 2006 01:05 PM

Or me.

Marijn Apr 17, 2006 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie
No it wouldn't! you've provided reasons that it would be worse.

That would be called sarcasm.

Black Ninja Apr 17, 2006 03:00 PM

Ok, here's the latest status update. I am pleased to announce that resolutions up to 1280x1024 work perfectly! It's important to note, however, that you'll need an AMAZING PC to run the game at such high resolutions.

Also, certain sprites kind of don't look as good at high resolutions. Particularly certain enemies.

I'll have screenshots up fairly soon (and possibly a website), but I'm still debating the release of this app.

Birdie Apr 17, 2006 03:14 PM

:\ Dont release it.
yet...

n00b Apr 17, 2006 03:22 PM

"Also, certain sprites kind of don't look as good at high resolutions." <-- That alone instantly turns me off the whole Hi-res craze people have accquired. Also if the sprites don't look good, how can we be sure if tilesets will look good? Will we have to make sure our tilesets are "Hi-Res Compatable"?

These potential graphical problems in a world where levels ratings can be swayed by eyecandy, can produce flawed ratings if played in a higher res where a tileset looks bad, and even in a lower res if a tileset was made speficially for a hi-res without any care to see if it looked as good in a lower res.

White Rabbit Apr 17, 2006 03:45 PM

n00b, you can decide that when the screenshots are here.

BN, despite the decision being yours, I think you should not keep discussion about this program on a private level. Start a poll, as suggested, and do support or go against what people are saying here. People's opinions change. I can't make my mind up about this, however. The program could certainly do a lot, and anything that happens as a result of releasing it would be more interesting than, well, the Misc. Forum, which I represent here as the community's alternative to scare you all. ;) It has been a dream, though small, for many to see JJ2 and higher resolutions combined, as if the moon would subsequently rise for the game...I won't get all poetical now (I don't know how :p)...

n00b Apr 17, 2006 03:49 PM

I can't test how a bunch of tilesets look in hi-res by looking at a few screenshots WR.

Marijn Apr 17, 2006 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit
n00b, you can decide that when the screenshots are here.

You don't have to see a screeny to have the idea that Hi-res will srew the game!

Grytolle Apr 17, 2006 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marijn
You don't have to see a screeny to have the idea that Hi-res will srew the game!

Why would it? Besides, this would make splitscreen less unbearable.

LittleFreak Apr 18, 2006 02:33 AM

It would certainly be useful for three/four-player splitscreen games.

R3ptile Apr 18, 2006 03:35 AM

Seriously, people, single player is not the issue. If you don't like the high-res, you could just change the resolution back to 640x480. Multiplayer is where this all really matters, because if this utility won't be released, some people would gain an unfair advantage and therefore the game would be ruined.

Grytolle Apr 18, 2006 03:43 AM

Yeah, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahah


;;O

Jerrythabest Apr 18, 2006 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit
Start a poll, as suggested, ...

By me!8D
I still like my suggestion;) tell me when you posted it!:lol:

Marijn Apr 18, 2006 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThA BLiNG BLiNG RaBBiT
Seriously, people, single player is not the issue. If you don't like the high-res, you could just change the resolution back to 640x480. Multiplayer is where this all really matters, because if this utility won't be released, some people would gain an unfair advantage and therefore the game would be ruined.

I totaly agree, I think that the 2 player mode ( and up ) with Hi-res is much better.. Good point! But if people can see you miles before you can see them ( if you don't have the same hex/application ) then it will be unfare.

Isn't that de reason that Neobeo don't release his VCR ?

ThunderPX Apr 18, 2006 09:14 AM

This difference in multiplayer is the current situation because not everyone knows how to switch to higher resolutions. With a fairly decent PC you should be able to go at least 800x600, which is good enough, since the bullets don't go any further anyway.

FQuist Apr 18, 2006 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThA BLiNG BLiNG RaBBiT
Multiplayer is where this all really matters, because if this utility won't be released, some people would gain an unfair advantage and therefore the game would be ruined.

That's not really true. It doesn't matter wether this utility is released or not, people will gain an unfair advantage in both situations. However, if you release it, the unfair advantages people have will be much bigger.

1. Only people who frequent the popular sites at the time the tool is released are likely to get it. A large amount of people don't visit these sites very often.

2. From all the people who play jj2, most of their computers will be able to play 600 x 480. However, with higher resolutions, only the computers of some will be able to bear them. If you have a huge resolution like 1280 x 1024, only a certain group of people will gain the largest advantage.

This means, releasing it creates a huge inequality between people with different computer speeds. When you release it there will be an unfair advantage, moreso than if you would not release it and people don't spread/abuse it and it is kept to a select few. If it's not released, the game is "ruined" how? Because Black Ninja and some others can play another way? It's not like you can't adapt.

Quote:

This difference in multiplayer is the current situation because not everyone knows how to switch to higher resolutions. With a fairly decent PC you should be able to go at least 800x600, which is good enough, since the bullets don't go any further anyway.
Another invalid argument. Bullets may not go farther but your sight goes farther, and you can adapt your strategy to the multitude of extra information you get on movements. You can dodge faster, move another way, attack people more easily, etcetera.

Regarding splitscreen, how many active forum/site frequenters actively play splitscreen? Compare with how many play online multiplayer, please.

R3ptile Apr 18, 2006 09:34 AM

This is why you must release this patch:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fquist
Bullets may not go farther but your sight goes farther, and you can adapt your strategy to the multitude of extra information you get on movements. You can dodge faster, move another way, attack people more easily, etcetera.


FQuist Apr 18, 2006 09:37 AM

Thanks for totally disregarding the rest of my argument and cherry-picking the bit out of it that suits you, R3ptile. At least try to invalidate it.

LittleFreak Apr 18, 2006 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franky
Regarding splitscreen, how many active forum/site frequenters actively play splitscreen?

I used to battle a friend in splitscreen mode quite often, actually. I still agree with your points though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by r3p
This is why you must release this patch:
(fquist's post)

Well, this is why JazzAdvantage should be made legal and uploaded to J2O:

-it makes getting good weapons easier
-you can get shields with really long time, it's awesome!
-you can do a lot of other nasty stuff
-it totally ruins game balance

R3ptile Apr 18, 2006 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fquist
2. From all the people who play jj2, most of their computers will be able to play 600 x 480. However, with higher resolutions, only the computers of some will be able to bear them. If you have a huge resolution like 1280 x 1024, only a certain group of people will gain the largest advantage.

So those people should get a new screen that supports a higher resolution. That's how it goes these days - the better computer you have the better a game works for you.

FQuist Apr 18, 2006 10:41 AM

That argument doesn't work - you yourself say that with smart people finding out how to use better resolutions they get an "unfair" advantage. I could say the same about that. "So these people should get smarter" or "these people should just find out" - that's "how it goes" these days.

n00b Apr 18, 2006 11:46 AM

R3p's cherry pickng of Fquist's post proves something: People may want it to make their matches easier.
The Hi-res is nothing more than a crutch, and is no better than a cheating program used in that context.

Grytolle Apr 18, 2006 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fquist
That's not really true. It doesn't matter wether this utility is released or not, people will gain an unfair advantage in both situations. However, if you release it, the unfair advantages people have will be much bigger.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fquist
Advantage will be smaller as more people share it.
Regarding splitscreen, how many active forum/site frequenters actively play splitscreen? Compare with how many play online multiplayer, please.

It's no like its hard to detect in memory wether splitscreen is on or not, and hence allow higher resolutiosn

n00b Apr 18, 2006 11:53 AM

You can online in splitscreen.
Some people may do that just to have the increased width.

Grytolle Apr 18, 2006 11:57 AM

it's still shared

R3ptile Apr 18, 2006 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by n00b
R3p's cherry pickng of Fquist's post proves something: People may want it to make their matches easier.
The Hi-res is nothing more than a crutch, and is no better than a cheating program used in that context.

Actually, the game is way too easy for me. I want to try something new. :rolleyes:

High-res would, however, make the game more based on skill much more than strategy.

Grytolle Apr 18, 2006 12:23 PM

Strategy = skill

Birdie Apr 18, 2006 01:16 PM

=D Yes stratagy is skill.
So I want to stratagy in the game ;P

blurredd Apr 18, 2006 02:49 PM

For the record, there are other less controversial ways of achieving more strategy or skill orientated games in JJ2. But if you already find this game too easy, you're not likely to find an adequate challenge with any changes of gameplay.

Monolith Apr 18, 2006 06:46 PM

I completely agree with and support Frank's large post.

Odin Apr 18, 2006 06:49 PM

I thought about this for a while, and I think 640x480 is too big already for JJ2. I'm gonna start a new topic.

Grytolle Apr 18, 2006 09:26 PM

Stop ignoring the idea of only allwing bigger resolutions for splitscreen players! ;(

Btw, those known to have this should seriously (;p) be disallowed to participate in any sort of competitive jj2.

Jerrythabest Apr 19, 2006 09:41 AM

okay, you guys have got me. I'm against now. I agree with Gry btw.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
JCF © 2001-Infinity Jazz2Online