Hm, this would probably be a very different if I had let DS win against me in Ofort.

Well, I think you would have won in SRuins then. Shouldn't have played with 3h in OFort, but with 5h it would have taken ages.

Anyway, I think the tournament winner will most likely be an 8D member, unless a non-8D member wins all matches from now on.

8 March: deadline for both Ric vs. Ragnarok and FireSworD vs. Hitch. If the games won't be played and no one forfeits both players are out (also, FS: you can't forfeit :P).

At least this hopefully means the tournament progresses.. :). Hopefully xD

Have I already won the tournament?

Perhaps

No, val did not win. Qz is allowing us more time to have our duel. We would've had it done at the deadline, but hitch was "not in the mood". Anyway, we should have our duel as soon as possible.

Alright then. I just want to give you a notice that I won't be availiable this summer. So you guys would better play your duel before May.

Well, since I'm a bit active again a little update. Hitch (finally) forfeited the tournament, which means FireSworD moves on to the UB Final. He and valmango might play this weekend or anytime soon.

In the UB there are.. 4 players left: Ragnarok, Ric, Sperry and Vivando. I know Sperry and Rag are willing to play, I don't know about the other two, but I'm sure they are as well. So come on guys (and girl), let's finish this tourney since it has been dragging on too long..

I'm planning on a new duel tournament soon, so this one better get finished soon, if at all. ;p

We should continue the national tournament :S

Yes, that one however, is a team tournament. But sure, that one should get finished as well.

Now I find it really impossible to arrange a final duel with FireSworD. So why don't I just leave out this duel and thus finally let FS win this tournament. Then I'll get to the LB and duel Vivando. Rag, Sperry and Ric don't seem to be interested in this tournament anymore so I think it'd be better to count them out.
It wouldn't take us much time to arrange and play the duel, so this tournament will be finished in no time.
This is the best way to finish this tournament imo.

Wheres a normal, updated schedule?
Im just wondering if you're putting words into players mouths now. :)

This is the latest schedule
Rag and Ric aren't willing to arrange their duel. Accordingly, Sperry can't play. No wonder this tournament isn't progressing. If you want this tournament to get finished fast you either hurry them someway or just count them out. Btw according to Qz's post if none of said duels are played till 8th of March, both players are out. Letting inactive players participate from now on will cause the tournament to slow down.
Anyway I forfeit duel against FS. So it seems I am on SJ's way. If the inactive participants are still in, hurry them up so that in-between winner will reach Vivando and so on. Or just count them out so that I'll duel Vivando and it won't be hard to continue the final part of the tournament.
So, I'm not putting words into their mouths. It's just obvious they're not interested anymore.

OMYGOSH! I were in this! So you peoples should finish it! If you don't, why didn't you let me win then? :r I played until the very end. :rolleyes:

Valmango vs. Vivando
Battle1 (my choice) 5-4 for Vivando
Dismal Palace (SJ's choice) 5-3 for Valmango
Starlight Falls II (tiebreaker) 5-4 for Vivando

Good game though I had really bad luck in b1. Last kill was just cheap!
Qz hosted.

I'll get Sperry to play, the others you can count out I suppose.
Its very likely Sperry/Rag lose against SJ anyway

Yeah, that B1 end was a bit of luck. He happened to spawn right next to me at the top-left of the level, and he got jailed or sth.

Anyway, it was a nice game. Also, how are you FS?

Okay, little change in plans thanks to all the forfeit wins/walkovers etc.

Since certain people wanted to play after all (after SJ and valmango finished their match) I now announce an alternate schedule with semi-finals!

The most progressed player (FS as winner of the UB) will now face the winner of Sperry vs. Rag (the two less progressed players). SJ and valmango played eachother, with SJ winning and progressing to the new final. Or, in a schedule:

Winner UB vs. least progressed player LB
Loser UB vs. most progressed player LB

which means these are the semi-finals:
FireSworD vs. Sperry/Ragnarok
valmango vs. Vivando: 4-5 B1, 5-3 Dismal, 4-5 SFalls2

The winner of the new final will win the tournament. Also, I'm not sure yet about a play-off for the 3rd place. I guess the involved players have to sort that out themselves.

Well, good luck with these duels and let's get this tourney finally finished :D ..

Wait. Aren't I already third? As I forfeited duel with FS and lost one to SJ I should've been third. And now SJ should fight FS for 1st/2nd place. I wouldn't have forfeited if I hadn't known I'd be in the top 3. Otherwise I'd just duel FS in spite of the fact it had been annoying to arrange that duel.
This sucks because I'll again have to duel someone who haven't even played enough games. I don't really have time for arranging and playing extra duels. And according to old rules, players that haven't played within given time should gtfo from the tourney or something like that. Why hadn't those players done something before I started finding a way of finishing this tourney?!
And now when there's a chance to get to the top3 for them they'll definitely wake up and claim for it. If they're still in they must play stated games, not jump over SJ and duel me for 3rd place.
These "little" additions and changes amid the tournament make it unfair, towards me at least, especially if I've played all duels I had to, except one with FS which I actually forfeited due to difficulties in arranging.
Also, there's really no sense in organizing "FS vs. Rag/Sperry". And if you make "me vs. Rag/Sperry" it'll last way longer. There's no sense in these duels especially when the loser is obvious.
You should call off unnecessary and pointless play-off games. Else I'll call off my forfeit to FS and we'll be playing this tournament for ages. Why can't I change my decision when the tournament is about to finish, just like you, Quickz?

wait, you're just saying '(-)(-)(-)(-) make me third already and ignore that rag and sperry still want to play.' basically you played a match that perhaps didn't even have to get played.
You forfeited against fs and went playing without approval of a tournament admin I guess. I told you 'wait perhaps I can get sperry to play' and even rag showed interest. What you're saying now is bs. Sperry played all matches she could have played and rag had to play someone who quit? ;)

I'm fine, how are you?

...And I thought I was overly explicit and rash with comments sometimes. Anyway, I really don't care who I get. The only thing I care about is if a western host is on, and can host one round. I don't care a whole lot about losing, it's losing duels unfairly, it quite honestly ticks me off, and I no longer tolerate it.

SJ and I asked Qz if we could play that duel. Quickz approved it. I wouldn't play it without his permission. And now when it's been played you talk back. I doubt they still want to play. If they really wanted to they'd have done that already.
And FS, waiting for a duel which I think wouldn't have been played in next months even is irritating so I can't wait that much.
Talking about unnecessary duels I meant the tournament duration. Those duels will just prolong the tournament and I thought this is the last thing you want to happen. I can't decide on things, you can play these duels if you want but getting me to play again is just all against me.
And I am not going to call off anything. I can't bear these additions, they're making me mad and all.
Whatever, if Sperry and Rag are keen on playing these duels so much, they'd better duel asap and the winner will face me like Quickz said.

I said twice before the duel I'd ask sperry at least and rag showed interest too still. That was before the duel too. I don't see your point. Even though you think they suck basically, kicking players out of a tournament while they're active shouldn't happen. You can't deny that.
Edit: and heck, its not even sure if there will be a play-off for the 3rd place so why care?

Fine, shared third place, no play-off, stop freaking out. I said before the losers of both semi-finals get to decide if there will be a play-off or not. Apparently you don't want one so there won't be one, it's that easy.

Now finish the DITbtl before I claim 3rd place :rolleyes:

Me and Rag can play tomorrow =P

We played...

5-3 Starlight Falls II
4-5 Battle3
5-4 Abandoned Robotics Factory.

I guess I won

Haha, that didn't sound convincing at all :D ..

Anyway, I assume you picked SFalls2 and SpR's choice was Battle3? And who hosted and do you have screenshots? :D I still have 3 screenshots of SJ vs. val, but I'm too lazy to upload 'em..

Anyway, FireSworD next up for you! Congratz SpR with a nice 5th place ^^

Can I join too? Please!:-)

I didn't actually wanna pick SFalls believe it or not, it was just my only option.

Gry hosted!

So, I can?

This tournament has almost finished. Sorry, you can't.

Ok. But, when it will be finished, who wants, can join my tournament.:-)

this is actually a good idea for a tournament ;)

Except treasure hunt isn't even 'an idea'.
Do a ctf tournament if you want to gain some face.

Do a ctf tournament if you want to gain some face for St. Louis.


Treasure hunt it is :roll:



Hehe, alright, sorry Emp, didn't mean all that.

You think that? I love treasure hunt, IMHO, is better than Battle. But, it would be a nice idea to make another one after this one, but for battle.:)