JazzJackrabbit Community Forums

JazzJackrabbit Community Forums (http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/index.php)
-   Site and Forum Rules, Questions & Feedback (http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Who... (http://www.jazz2online.com/jcf/showthread.php?t=8694)

Xion Jul 26, 2003 12:15 PM

Who...
 
Edited my sig and shrunk my Xion picture?

And also, Why?

Xion Jul 26, 2003 12:17 PM

Found out why...

Note: The signature was edited. You may only change this signature if the end result is a signature of equal or smaller size.

There are no posted rules about signature sizes. Therefore I feel that this is injust.

Trafton Jul 26, 2003 12:29 PM

I do not think it is a new rule. I believe that you even had your signature edited for it when you were using the name Pheonix (sic). Signatures are supposed to be less than a page in length on medium font size under Internet Explorer with a normal resolution.

~ Traft

Xion Jul 26, 2003 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trafton
normal resolution.

Please define "normal resolution". 800x600? 1024x720? 640x480?

KRSplat Jul 26, 2003 06:35 PM

Probably 640x800 or whatever the smallest one is now. You might want to follow the old 79 character rule, although that applies better to fonts that have equal character sizes (I forgot what they are called.)

Krezack Aug 5, 2003 04:28 AM

Normal resolution is 1024x768.

KRSplat Aug 5, 2003 07:03 AM

For sizing purposes, 640x480 is usually used, because it is the smallest possible size on most monitors.

Link Aug 5, 2003 07:50 AM

Almost nobody uses 640x480 anymore. It's not even available the normal way in Windows XP.

1024x768 is the best standard. It's the lowest resolution that the majority of people use.

KRSplat Aug 5, 2003 06:29 PM

I agree, Link, but I still believe 640x480 is best for sizing because it is the lowest normal resolution possible on most monitors.

Krezack Aug 5, 2003 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRSplat
For sizing purposes, 640x480 is usually used, because it is the smallest possible size on most monitors.

Well, you'd be the minority group who thinks that. Many, many people, experts and computer n00bs alike, would suggest 1024 as the standard.

KRSplat Aug 6, 2003 06:41 AM

That would mean that those who use 640x480 are disadvantaged.

Xion Aug 6, 2003 02:14 PM

lol

(I'm using 800x600 because my parents have bad eyes. I kinda like it that way. Any smaller and It would strain my eyes.)

KRSplat Aug 6, 2003 02:28 PM

800x600 would probably strain my eyes.

Krezack Aug 6, 2003 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRSplat
That would mean that those who use 640x480 are disadvantaged.

It would, because you'd only use that setting if you were mentally or visually handicapped in the first place.

KRSplat Aug 7, 2003 04:54 AM

That may be true. :P


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
JCF © 2001-Infinity Jazz2Online