Hi,

i got 1.24 with TSF and cant patch.


i wanted to check here: https://www.jazz2online.com/44/jazz-jackrabbit-patches/
"Note: if you get error messages about your game version when running the patch, try if the following forum topic clears things up: Versions of Jazz Jackrabbit 2, and why patches don't work.

but the specified link is dead.


Anybody know why i cant patch or got a different link to the dead one?



Thanks in advance. <3

That's concerning that the thread linked to is broken. In any case, when you say you "cant patch" I'm guessing you're referring to JJ2+? Quoting from the main JJ2+ forum thread:

Originally Posted by Violet CLM

Note that in order to use JJ2+, you will need a registered copy of Jazz Jackrabbit 2, version 1.23 or 1.24. If one of the splash screens shown when starting up the game says "LK Avalon," that is additionally not a compatible version of the game.

Or, quoting from the About section of the JJ2+ readme:

JJ2+ only works with the full (non-shareware) versions 1.23 and 1.24 ("TSF") of Jazz Jackrabbit 2, although not all versions of 1.23 and 1.24 are supported; in particular, TSF: LK Avalon is not supported, nor the various Holiday Hare/Christmas Chronicles releases. If you are running JJ2 version 1.20 through 1.22, you will need first to apply the 1.23 patch, then JJ2+ (see Installation below). If you are running version 1.00 or 1.10, you are legally out of luck; those are non-commercial beta versions of the game, and cannot directly be upgraded to full commercial releases.

Is this your problem? If not, you may need to be more explicit about what you are trying to do and what happens when you try to do it.

Yea i ment that.
I got it working after a restart of my PC, but now Lori is missing from Charakter Select, even tho i got TTF nad had her before applying the Patch. The Splash Screen after starting shows Lori.

I think the more clearly you can describe what you did the better. Right now your account is very vague and therefore difficult to diagnose.

This user has never come back, their problem remains unclear, and the J2O node in question has been rewritten, so I'm closing this thread. It doesn't seem like any more fruitful discussion will result from it.